A real-time alert list of journals that hit Rejected posting status in Finance & Operations in the last hour. Each row is a posting that did not land in the GL.
At a glance
A live alert list of every journal whosePostingStatusflipped toRejectedin Finance & Operations within the last hour. A rejected journal is one that the system or a posting validation refused to commit to the General Ledger. Common causes are out-of-balance lines, a closed ledger period, a financial-dimension validation failure, or a missing main account. Each rejection is unbooked activity: the entry the user intended is not in the GL until someone fixes and re-posts it. This card is the real-time queue the finance systems team works to keep the ledger clean.
Calculation
Calculated automatically from your Microsoft Dynamics 365 data. See the At a glance summary above for what the metric tracks and the worked example below for a typical reading.Worked example
A multi-entity retailer on Finance & Operations with three legal entities (UK Retail Ltd, US Retail Inc, EU Retail BV) and a nightly batch that posts ecom settlement journals. The snapshot is taken at 09:14 on 12 Apr 26, covering rejections since 08:14.
Four things to notice:
- Four rejections fired the alert at 09:14. The threshold is any rejection in the last hour, so the moment the nightly batch left these four in
Rejectedstate the card lit up and the finance systems team had a worklist before the controller opened the ledger. - The out-of-balance on GJ-2026-04-118 is the classic case. Debits and credits differ by $42.00, so F&O refused to post. The fix is to find the unbalanced line, usually a rounding or FX line the import dropped, and re-post. Until then the settlement is not in the GL and the bank reconciliation for US Retail Inc will not tie.
- GJ-2026-04-119 is a closed-period rejection, not a data error. The posting date fell inside a ledger period that was already closed. The journal is fine; it just needs re-dating into the open period or the period needs reopening if the close was premature. This row should be cross-checked against the Ledger Period Close Status card.
- GJ-2026-04-124 points at a chart-of-accounts gap. Main account 4055 does not exist in the EU Retail BV chart, so a line referencing it cannot post. This is a setup fix, not a one-off correction: until the account is created the same source feed will keep rejecting. Engineering is on the role list precisely because some rejections are integration or master-data defects rather than accounting mistakes.
Sibling cards merchants should reference together
This alert list is the front door to the ledger-integrity cluster. Pair it with these to find root cause and confirm the fix.Reconciling against Microsoft Dynamics 365
Where to look in Business Central / Finance & Operations:Finance & Operations: General ledger > Journal entries > General journals filtered to Status = Rejected Finance & Operations: System administration > Inquiries > Batch jobs (for batch-posted journals that failed) Finance & Operations: General ledger > Ledger settle and post > posting validation messages Business Central: Finance > General Journals (the closest equivalent; BC surfaces posting errors at post time rather than a persisted Rejected status)In F&O,
PostingStatus = Rejected is a real persisted state on the journal header, so the native General journals list filtered to Status = Rejected is the closest match to this card. The difference is that this card spans every connected legal entity in one queue and timestamps the rejection so you can see what failed in the last hour without flipping between companies.
Why our number may legitimately differ:
Cross-connector reconciliation:
This is a finance-systems integrity card with no commerce-platform equivalent. Rejections that originate from ecom settlement or order-import feeds, however, often correlate with connector health: a malformed settlement journal frequently traces back to the same mapping defects surfaced on Power Automate Flow Failures (Ecom Integration). When a rejection spike coincides with a connector failure, treat the integration as the root cause rather than fixing each journal by hand.